Treatise Answer To Hills Imposture Detected
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-answer-to-hills-imposture-detected-004 |
| Words | 385 |
However, “he renounces the discipline of the Church.”
(Page 15.) This objection too I have answered at large, in
my Letters to Dr. Church,-another kind of opponent than
Mr. Rowland Hill; a gentleman, a scholar, and a Christian;
and as such he both spoke and wrote. 15. “He falsely says, Almost all who were educated at
Trevecka, except those that were ordained, and some of them
too, disclaimed the Church, nay, and spoke of it upon all
occasions with exquisite bitterness and contempt.” This is a
terrible truth. If Lady Huntingdon requires it, I can
procure affidavits, both concerning the time and place. 16. “He professes he stands in no need of Christ's
righteousness.” (Page 23.) I never professed any such
thing. The very sermon referred to, the fifth in the first
volume, proves the contrary. But I flatly deny that sense of
imputed righteousness which Mr. Hill contends for. 17. “He expressly maintains the merit of good works, in
order to justification.” (Page 24.) Neither expressly nor
implicitly. I hope Mr. Hill has not read Mr. Fletcher's
Checks, nor my sermons on the subject. If he has not, he
has a poor excuse for this assertion: If he has, he can have
no excuse at all. 18. “He contradicts himself concerning Enoch and Elijah. See his Notés, the former edition.” (Page 28.) Wisely
directed ! for Mr. Hill knew the mistake was corrected in
the next edition. 19. “He is ever raising malicious accusations against the
lives and doctrines of all Calvinists, whether Churchmen or
Dissenters, throughout all the kingdom.” (Page 29.)
Thousands of Calvinists know the contrary, both Church
men and Dissenters. 20. “He exerts all his art to irritate the civil powers
against all the people of God.” (Page 30.) “He says, the
Dissenters revile and lightly esteem the sacred person of the
King.” I answer, (1.) Are the Dissenters, are the Calvin
ists, “all the people of God?” (2.) If you think they
are, do all these defend the American rebels? Who
affirms it? I hope not a quarter, not a tenth part, of them. (3.) Do I say, all the Dissenters revile the King? I
neither say so, nor think so. Those that do, are guilty of
what you impute to me. They “irritate the civil powers”
against themselves. 21.