Treatise Answer To Hills Imposture Detected
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-answer-to-hills-imposture-detected-000 |
| Words | 400 |
An Answer to Mr. Rowland Hill's Imposture Detected
Source: The Works of John Wesley, Volume 10 (Zondervan)
Author: John Wesley
---
IN a tract just published by Mr. Rowland Hill, there are
several assertions which are not true; and the whole
pamphlet is wrote in an unchristian and ungentlemanlike
manner. I shall first set down the assertions in order, and
then proceed to the manner. I. 1. “Throughout the whole of Paul's Epistles, he can
scarcely write a single line without mentioning Christ.” (Page
3.) I just opened on the fifteenth chapter of the First Epistle
to the Corinthians. In the last thirty verses of this chapter,
how often does he mention Christ? In every single line? 2. “In that wretched harangue, which he calls a sermon,
he makes himself the only subject of his own panegyrics.”
(Page 4.)
Being aware of this charge, I have said, “I am, in one
respect, an improper person to give this information; as it
will oblige me frequently to speak of myself, which may have
the appearance of ostentation. But, with regard to this, I
can only cast myself upon the candour of my hearers; being
persuaded they will put the most favourable construction upon
what is not a matter of choice, but of necessity. For there
is no other person, if I decline the task, who can supply my
place, who has a perfect knowledge of the work in question,
from the beginning of it to this day.” (Sermons, Vol. VII.,
p. 420.)
I give an account of the rise of this work at Oxford, from
1725 to 1735, pages 421, 422; at London and elsewhere,
pages 422,423. In all this there is not a line of panegyric
upon myself, but a naked recital of facts. Nor is there any
panegyric on any one in the following pages, but a plain
account of the Methodist doctrines. It may be observed, (if it is worth observing,) that I
preached in the open air in October, 1735. Mr. Whitefield
was not then ordained. 3. “Not a single line tending to vindicate, or illustrate,
any one fundamental doctrine of the gospel appears
throughout the whole.” (Imposture Detected, p. 4.) Yes:
“Thou shalt love the Lord thy God,” is one fundamental
doctrine of the gospel: “Thou shalt love thy neighbour as
thyself,” is another. And both these are vindicated and
illustrated for several pages together. 4.