Treatise Answer To Churchs Remarks
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-answer-to-churchs-remarks-030 |
| Words | 395 |
What resemblance then does Mr. C., thus opposing
me, bear to me opposing (if I really did) a parochial Minister? (3) “You said to Mr. C., ‘You should not have supplanted
me in my own house, stealing the hearts of the people.” Yet
you have supplanted the Clergy in their own houses.” What,
in the same manner as Mr. C. did me? Have I done to any of
them as he has done to me? You may as justly say I have cut
their throats! Stealing the hearts of their people. Nor are
these their people in the same sense wherein those were mine,
viz., servants of the devil brought, through my ministry, to be
servants and children of God. “You have suffered by the same
ways you took to discharge your spleen and malice against your
brethren.” To discharge your spleen and malice / Say, your
muskets and blunderbusses: I have just as much to do with
one as the other. (4.) “Your brother said to Mr. C., ‘You ought to have told
my brother fairly, I preach contrary to you. Are you willing
I should continue in your house, gainsaying you? Shall I stay
here opposing you, or shall I depart ’’ Think you hear this
spoken to you by us. What can you justly reply?” I can
justly reply, Sir, Mr. C.’s case totally differs from yours. Therefore it makes absolutely nothing to your purpose. 17. A farther consequence (you think) of my preaching this
doctrine, is, “the introducing that of absolute predestination. And whenever these errors,” say you, “gain ground, there can
be no wonder, that confusion, presumption, and despair, many
very shocking instances of all which you give us among your
followers, should be the consequences.” (Remarks, p. 52.)
You should by all means have specified a few of those instances,
or, at least, the pages where they occur. Till this is done, I can
look upon this assertion as no other than a flourish of your pen. To conclude this head: You roundly affirm, once for all,
“The grossest corruptions have ever followed the spreading of
this tenet. The greatest heats and animosities have been raised
thereby. The wildest errors have been thus occasioned. And
in proportion to its getting ground, it has never failed to per
plex the weak, to harden the wicked, and to please the profane.