Wesley Corpus

Treatise Answer To Churchs Remarks

AuthorJohn Wesley
Typetreatise
YearNone
Passage IDjw-treatise-answer-to-churchs-remarks-024
Words389
Justifying Grace Universal Redemption Works of Piety
“Was not irreligion and vice already prevailing enough in the nation, but we must--throw snares in people’s way, and root out the remains of piety and devotion, in the weak and well-meaning? That this has been the case, your own con fessions put beyond all doubt. And you even now hold and teach the principles from which these dangerous consequences do plainly and directly follow.” (Page 3.) “Was not irreligion and vice already prevailing enough,” (whether I have increased them, we will consider by and by,) “but we must throw snares in people’s way?” God forbid! My whole life is employed in taking those snares out of people's way, which the world and the devil had thrown there. “And root out the remains of piety and devotion in the weak and well-meaning?” Of whom speaketh the Prophet this? of himself, or of some other man? “Your own confessions put this beyond all doubt.” What! that “I root out the remains of piety and devotion?” Not so. The sum of them all recited above amounts to this and no more: “That while my brother and I were absent from London, many weak men were tainted with wrong opinions, most of whom we recovered at our return; but even those who continued therein did, notwith standing, continue to live a holier life than ever they did before they heard us preach.” “And you even now hold the principles from which these dangerous consequences do plainly and directly follow.” But I know not where to find these con sequences, unless it be in your title-page. There indeed I read of the very fatal tendency of justification by faith only: “The divisions and perplexities of the Methodists, and the many errors relating both to faith and practice, which,” as you con ceive, “have already arisen among these deluded people.” However, you “charitably believe, I was not aware of these consequences at first.” (Remarks, p. 4.) No, nor am I yet; though it is strange I should not, if they so naturally suc ceed that doctrine. I will go a step farther. I do not know, neither believe, that they ever did succeed that doctrine, unless perhaps accidentally, as they might have succeeded any doctrine whatsoever. And till the contrary is proved, those conse quences cannot show that these principles are not true. 13.