Treatise Answer To Churchs Remarks
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | treatise |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-treatise-answer-to-churchs-remarks-016 |
| Words | 384 |
For none of these has so direct,
immediate a relation to justification as faith. This is proxi
mately necessary thereto; repentance remotely, as it is neces
sary to the increase or continuance of repentance.* And even
in this sense, these are only necessary on supposition,--if there
be time and opportunity for them; for in many instances there
is not ; but God cuts short his work, and faith prevents the
fruits of repentance: So that the general proposition is not
overthrown, but clearly established, by these concessions; and
we conclude still, that faith alone is the proximate condition
of justification.”
4. This is what I hold concerning justification. I am next
briefly to observe what you object. “If faith,” say you, “is
the sole condition of justification, then it is our sole duty.”
(Remarks, p. 25.) I deny the consequence. Faith may be,
in the sense above described, the sole condition of justification;
and yet not only repentance be our duty before, but all obedi
ence after, we believe. . You go on : “If good works are not conditions of our justi
fication,they are not conditions of our (final) salvation.” (Page
25.) I deny the consequence again. Good works, properly
so called, cannot be the conditions of justification; because it
* See this glaring misprint of one of the earliest editions corrected by Mr. Wes
ley himself in a subsequent part of this volume, page 428.--EDIT. is impossible to do any good work before we are justified. And
yet, notwithstanding, good works may be, and are, conditions
of final salvation. For who will say it is impossible to do any
good work before we are finally saved? You proceed: “Can we be saved in the contemptuous neg
lect of repentance, prayer,” &c.? (Page 26.) No, nor justified
neither; but while they are previous to faith, these are not
allowed to be good works. You afterwards argue from my own concessions, thus:
“Your notion of true stillness is, ‘a patient waiting upon God,
by lowliness, meekness, and resignation, in all the ways of his
holy law, and the works of his commandments. But how is
it possible to reconcile to this, the position, that these duties
are not conditions of our justification? If we are justified
without them, we may be saved without them.