Journal Vol1 3
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | journal |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-journal-vol1-3-635 |
| Words | 316 |
their turn to inflict it on, their brethren? Almost every one cries out
against the spirit of persecution. But few seem to dive into the causes
of it: and fewer still heartily seek after and follow the effectual cure. And
therefore,
“ 3. Is it not the duty both of ministers and of private Christians in
their several stations, to show that our particular opinions are not so important but that one in whom the grand characteristic is found may hold
different, nay, contrary opinions? Is it not the duty of all, in their respective stations, to prevent or dissolve that groundless association of ideas?
And is not the quite contrary done by almost all? Do they not proceed
as if they were rather desirous to establish (not dissolve) that association of ideas, in favour of their own particular opinions? And thereby,
(though perhaps their own hearts hide it from them,) to establish their
party, and fix their adherents unto them?
“4, Since, as you justly say, ‘We are more sure that love is of God,
than that any opinion whatsoever is so,’ is it not our duty to follow that
love with all our brethren in Christ, and the native consequence of it,
outward communion? So far, I mean, as that communion does not
imply cur owning as true, an opinion which we do not believe to be so.
And yet,
“5. When one is a member of a community where many are extremely
bigoted to their own opinions: in such a case, may not outward communion with our other brethren in Christ be kept in some instances and not
in others? But still, is it not our duty to use all our prudence and diligence to bring all the Lord’s people from this bigotry, into that dear,
mutual, universal love, and that actual communion, which is the native
consequence of it?
“ James ERSKINE.”