To 1776
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | journal |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-journal-1773-to-1776-131 |
| Words | 395 |
21.--We found the election for Parliament-men had
put all Kilkenny in an uproar. In consequence of this, we had
a small, dead congregation. But another cause of this was,
the bitter and perpetual quarrels between the chief members
of the society. I talked largely with the contending parties,
and they promised better behaviour for the time to come. Wed. 22.--I went on to Clonmell, where, our Room being
small, and the weather unfavourable for preaching abroad, we
procured the largest room in the town, which was in the Qua
kers’ workhouse. I had scarce sat down when a young man
came and said, “My father and mother send their kind respects,
and would be glad of thy company this evening.” His mother
(now Mrs. Dudley) was my old acquaintance, Molly Stokes. I
went at four, and spent an hour very agreeably. But much
company coming in, Mr. Dudley desired I would call again in
the morning. I then told him what his wife was reported to
say of me: He answered me, it was an utter mistake; that she
had never spoke a disrespectful word concerning me. Thur. 23.--Several of our brethren from Cork met at Rath
cormic. I was glad to find Mr. Rankin with them, just arrived
from America. When we came to Cork, the congregation was
waiting; so I began without delay. Sun. 26.-I earnestly exhorted a numerous congregation at
eight, to “abstain from fleshly desires;”--a necessary lesson in
every place, and no where more so than in Cork. At St. Peter's church I saw a pleasing sight, the Independent Com
120 REv. J. W. Esley’s [April, 1778. panies, raised by private persons associating together, without
any expense to the Government. They exercised every day;
and, if they answer no other end, at least keep the Papists in
order; who were exceedingly alert, ever since the army was
removed to America. Mon. 27.--In going to Bandon, I read Abbé Raynal's “His
tory of the Settlements and Trade of the Europeans in the
Indies.” I would be glad to propose a few queries. I ask, 1. Is not this “Philosophical History” (so called) in many parts
profoundly dull; exactly fitted to spread a pleasing slumber over
the eyes of the gentle reader? 2. Are there not several pas
sages quite obscure? Is this the fault of the author or the trans
lator? 3.