To 1773
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | journal |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-journal-1760-to-1773-510 |
| Words | 391 |
It struck me more than any
thing of the kind I have seen in England; more than Blenheim
House itself. One great difference is, every thing there
appears designedly grand and splendid; here every thing is
quite, as it were, natural, and one thinks it cannot be other
wise. If the expression may be allowed, there is a kind of
stiffness runs through the one, and an easiness through the
other. Of pictures I do not pretend to be a judge; but there
is one, by Paul Rubens, which particularly struck me, both
with the design and the execution of it. It is Zacharias and
Elizabeth, with John the Baptist, two or three years old,
coming to visit Mary, and our Lord sitting upon her knee. The passions are surprisingly expressed, even in the children;
but I could not see either the decency or common sense of
painting them stark naked: Nothing can defend or excuse
Feb. 1772.] JOURNAL. 453
this: It is shockingly absurd, even an Indian being the judge. I allow, a man who paints thus may have a good hand, but
certainly cerebrum non habet.*
Sun. 9.--I buried the remains of Heller Tanner. About
thirty years he has adorned the Gospel: Diligent, patient,
loving to every man, and zealous of good works. Mon. 10.-Ingoing to Dorking, I read Mr. Jones’s ingenious
tract, upon Clean and Unclean Beasts. He really seems to
prove his point, to make it reasonably plain, that there is a
deeper design in that part of the Levitical Law, than is
commonly understood: That God had a view throughout,
to the moral, rather than natural, qualities of the creatures
which he pronounced unclean; and intended it as a standing
warning to his people, against the fierceness, greediness, and
other ill properties, which so eminently belonged to those
beasts or birds that they were forbidden to eat or touch. Tues. 11.--I casually took a volume of what is called,
“A Sentimental Journey through France and Italy.”
Sentimental / what is that? It is not English: He might
as well say, Continental. It is not sense. It conveys no
determinate idea; yet one fool makes many. And this
nonsensical word (who would believe it?) is become a
fashionable one ! However, the book agrees full well with
the title; for one is as queer as the other.