To 1773
| Author | John Wesley |
|---|---|
| Type | journal |
| Year | None |
| Passage ID | jw-journal-1760-to-1773-045 |
| Words | 388 |
“On the contrary, the Church of Rome, in its present form,
was not ‘founded by Christ himself. All the doctrines and
practices wherein she differs from us, were not instituted by
Christ,-they were unknown to the ancient church of Christ,
--they are unscriptural, novel corruptions; neither is that
Church ‘propagated throughout the world.” Therefore, if
either antiquity, or universality, be essential thereto, the
Church of Rome cannot be “the true church of Christ.’
“Nor is the Church of Rome one ; it is not in unity with
itself; it is to this day torn with numberless divisions. And
Feb. 1761.] JOURNAL. 43
it is impossible it should be “the one church, unless a part
can be the whole; seeing the Asiatic, the African, and the
Muscovite Churches, (to name no more,) never were
contained in it. “Neither is it holy: The generality of its members are no
holier than Turks or Heathens. You need not go far for
proof of this: Look at the Romanists in London or Dublin. Are these the holy, the only holy church? Just such holiness
is in the bottomless pit. “Nor is it ‘secured against error, either ‘by Christ’ or “his
Spirit; witness Pope against Pope, Council against Council,
contradicting, anathematizing, each other. The instances are
too numerous to be recited. “Neither are the generality of her ‘Pastors and Teachers’
either ‘divinely appointed’ or ‘divinely assisted. If God had
sent them, he would confirm the word of his messengers; but
he does not; they convert no sinners to God; they convert
many to their own opinion, but not to the knowledge or love
of God. He that was a drunkard, is a drunkard still; he that
was filthy, is filthy still; therefore neither are they ‘assisted’
by him; so they and their flocks wallow in sin together:
Consequently, (whatever may be the case of some particular
souls,) it must be said, if your own marks be true, the Roman
Catholics in general are not ‘the people of God.’”
It may be proper to add here the second section, which is
all I had leisure to write, though it was not published till the
following week:--
“‘The Methodist’ (Protestant) ‘Teachers are not the true
Ministers of Christ; nor are they called or sent by him.’ (P.6.)
“‘This appears from what has been already demonstrated.